Michigan

Big Ten · 5-4CFP unranked

Michigan is 5-4 and No. 36 of 138 in the machine's ratings, 9.6 points better than an average FBS team. Last game: lost 15-6 vs Michigan State in Week 10.

Week 11: at Oregon, Saturday, Nov 14: the matchup, unit by unit

Machine rankNo. 36of all FBS teams
Rating now9.69.6 points better than an average FBS team
Since July−6.3from 15.9 in the preseason rating

Why Michigan is No. 36

  • Michigan's rating is 9.6: the machine's estimate that Michigan is 9.6 points better than an average FBS team on a neutral field. That is No. 36 of 138. For scale, 0 is an average FBS team: right now the closest to it is No. 68 Arizona State (0.2).
  • It started the season at 15.9, ESPN's preseason Football Power Index from July. Its results since have moved it down 6.3.
  • The biggest weekly moves: −3.1 after Week 1 (W 13-12 vs Western Michigan) and −2.1 after Week 5 (L 14-20 at Minnesota).
  • Its record is 5-4. The 4 losses were to No. 9 Indiana, No. 17 Iowa, No. 58 Michigan State, No. 67 Minnesota, by 5.8 points on average. The 5 wins came by 10.6 points on average; the best was over No. 16 Oklahoma. The rating weighs how much a team won or lost by and against whom, not just the win-loss count.
  • Its FBS opponents so far average No. 56 in the machine's ratings.
  • Just above is No. 35 Penn State (9.7); just below is No. 37 Auburn (9.6).

The rating, week by week

Strengths and weak spots

Head coach

Kyle Whittingham is in his 1st season at Michigan. This season: 5-4.

Data provided by CollegeFootballData.com.

Team stats

Season totals and averages over 9 games, each with its national rank among 138 FBS teams (No. 1 = best). The game-by-game story is in the season, week by week.

Passing

Completions-attempts135-220
Passing yards1565
Touchdowns-interceptions7-9
Yards per attempt*7.1No. 88 of 138
Explosive pass rate8.0%No. 124 of 138
Sacks allowed (rate)7.6%No. 114 of 138

Rushing

Carries-yards324-1158
Yards per carry3.6No. 119 of 138
10-plus-yard runs (rate)8.6%No. 133 of 138
Stuffed at or behind the line (rate)15.9%No. 49 of 138

Scoring

Points per game19.6No. 126 of 138
Yards per play5.05No. 123 of 138
Third-down rate41.9%No. 50 of 138
Red-zone TD rate62.5%No. 59 of 138
Giveaways17No. 131 of 138

Defense

Points allowed per game16.2No. 14 of 138
Yards per play allowed4.30No. 4 of 138
Yards per pass attempt allowed5.9No. 11 of 138
Yards per carry allowed3.0No. 15 of 138
Sack rate7.1%No. 35 of 138
Takeaways9No. 101 of 138
Third-down rate allowed33.9%No. 33 of 138

Totals are the official box score. * Yards per attempt and the rates come from the play-by-play, where passing yards count on completions only, so they can differ from the box score by a play or two.

Data provided by CollegeFootballData.com.

Player leaders

The top 3 in each category over the same games. Passing yards count every completion (official box score).

Passing

  1. Bryce Underwood72-124, 924 yds, 5 TD, 6 INT
  2. Tommy Carr63-94, 641 yds, 2 TD, 3 INT

Rushing

  1. Savion Hiter93 carries, 331 yds, 3 TD
  2. Jordan Marshall88 carries, 323 yds, 5 TD
  3. Bryce Underwood61 carries, 222 yds, 2 TD

Receiving

  1. JJ Buchanan40 catches, 637 yds, 5 TD
  2. Andrew Marsh43 catches, 398 yds, 1 TD
  3. Hogan Hansen14 catches, 142 yds, 0 TD

Tackles

  1. Troy Bowles72
  2. Chris Bracy60
  3. Nathaniel Staehling50

Sacks

  1. John Henry Daley5.5
  2. Dominic Nichols2.5
  3. Chris Bracy2

Interceptions

  1. Chris Bracy1
  2. Jonah Lea'Ea1
  3. Jyaire Hill1

Data provided by CollegeFootballData.com.

Who's playing

Based on who has actually played this season, from the box scores, not the team's published depth chart. Each bar is that player's share of the team's attempts, carries (quarterbacks left out), catches or tackles. The box score lists no positions, so there is no offensive line here.

Throwing

  1. Bryce Underwood6 games124 attempts57%
  2. Tommy CarrMost passes in the last game5 games94 attempts43%

Carrying

  1. Savion Hiter9 games93 carries43%
  2. Jordan Marshall9 games88 carries40%
  3. Bryson Kuzdzal7 games30 carries14%

Catching

  1. Andrew Marsh9 games43 catches32%
  2. JJ Buchanan9 games40 catches30%
  3. Hogan Hansen5 games14 catches10%
  4. Savion Hiter6 games9 catches7%

Tackling

  1. Troy Bowles9 games72 tackles13%
  2. Chris Bracy9 games60 tackles11%
  3. Nathaniel Staehling8 games50 tackles9%
  4. Jyaire Hill9 games38 tackles7%

Data provided by CollegeFootballData.com.

The season, week by week

  1. Week 1 W 13–12 vs Western Michigan. The pass defense was the strength: Western Michigan got 4.2 yards an attempt, 3.1 under what it usually gains. Lost the turnover battle by 3.
  2. Week 2 W 17–10 vs Oklahoma. The pass defense was the strength: Oklahoma got 5.7 yards an attempt, 1.7 under what it usually gains. Won the turnover battle by 2.
  3. Week 3 W 52–17 vs UTEP. The run defense was the strength: UTEP got 1.8 yards a carry, 2.0 under what it usually gains. The fewest yards a carry it has allowed all season.
  4. Week 4 L 19–20 vs Iowa. The passing game was the strength: 9.9 yards an attempt, 3.5 more than Iowa usually allows. The machine had Michigan by 4.1 (61%), so this was a loss it did not see coming.
  5. Week 5 L 14–20 at Minnesota. The passing game struggled: 4.8 yards an attempt, 3.1 less than Minnesota usually allows. The machine had Michigan by 8.8 (71%), so this was a loss it did not see coming.
  6. Week 7 W 21–18 vs Penn State. The run defense was the strength: Penn State got 2.2 yards a carry, 2.2 under what it usually gains. Its most yards a carry of the season.
  7. Week 8 L 6–13 vs Indiana. The pass defense was the strength: Indiana got 4.5 yards an attempt, 4.6 under what it usually gains. Its fewest yards a carry of the season.
  8. Week 9 W 28–21 at Rutgers. The run game struggled: 3.6 yards a carry, 2.2 less than Rutgers usually allows. The most yards an attempt it has allowed all season.
  9. Week 10 L 6–15 vs Michigan State. The run game struggled: 2.1 yards a carry, 2.1 less than Michigan State usually allows. The machine had Michigan by 11.0 (76%), so this was a loss it did not see coming; Michigan lost the turnover battle by 4.

How to read this